Doppleganger at The Observer

Posted by Jenny | Posted in Uncategorized | Posted on 29-11-2009

0

That's right. Today, I have discovered that there are two of me. The other one writes very good articles and is clearly one step ahead when it comes to discovering new and exciting bookshops. That's clearly the only way to explain this article in The Observer today. From the Borders-hate to the Georgette Heyer-love – I do know, Rachel – and even through to the immediate appreciation of a book called Women Who Read Are Dangerous, this woman is clearly me in disguise. And that book is going straight on my wishlist.

I'd also like to take this opportunity to point out that I made with the anti-Borders rant a mere hop skip and a jump before they actually went into administration. In some strange, karmic way, it's as though I myself brought upon their downfall. I'm fairly sure it doesn't really work that way, but it's nice to fool myself occasionally.
As soon as I have a spare moment, I will make my way over to Lutyens & Rubinstein with joy in my heart and book-lust in my step. I can never have too many lovely bookshops to visit.
So respect for Rachel Cooke: a woman of taste and distinction. Bravo.

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

Call my bluff

Posted by Jenny | Posted in Uncategorized | Posted on 28-11-2009

0

While still, naturally, committed to the intoxicating nature of the written-and-bound word, I've recently discovered the wonders of The London Review of Books. It's been going for a long time, and I've always been interested in picking it up, but as I generally prefer books to magazines, I never actually did. How wrong I was! 

It's stunningly well written, and is full of extremely long pieces of writing, with – mostly – relatively recent books as the ostensible focus. Really, the 'reviews' are simply excellent articles on the subject of the book (if indeed there is one: sometimes they don't even bother having a released book as an excuse to write about interesting things) by writers who really do know their stuff. Interspersed with this, or even just muttered at the beginning and/or end, they make comments on the quality of the reviewed book.
It just has this great dynamic and frequently makes me laugh: and not just at the personal ads, which can be found here. There are some serious ones (dull) but are mostly hilarious.
The wonderful thing about LRB, though? Just every so often, I come across words that I don't know. This is always exciting to me, as a lover of language. So, in homage to both LRB and my favourite literature game-show-that-was, Call My Bluff, here are some of the words I've come across. Below them, you will find three definitions, of which only one is the correct one. See if you can do it!
(Answers in the comments, folks.)
Palimpsest, n.
1. A type of Roman chaise-longue owned only by the very wealthy.
2. A boil associated with the disease tyrosinemia, that changes in colour dependent upon the stage of infection.
3. A parchment or similar from which writing has been partially or completely erased to make room for another text.
Sybaritic, adj.
1. Affliction with a disease which is characterised by rashes, headache, and nausea.
2. Characterised by or loving luxury or sensuous pleasure.
3. Possessing an unusual learning disorder that prevents one from being able to process the rules of grammar.
Fissiparous, adj.
1. Tendency towards the love of wealth for its own sake; avaricious.
2. Tendency to break up into parts or away from a main body; factious.
3. Capable of absorbing small chunks of decomposed matter.

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

Some Autumn Reading

Posted by Jenny | Posted in Uncategorized | Posted on 22-11-2009

0

On the epic list of books that I keep updated each year – although the 2008 list was lost in the Great Computer Crash of 2009 (GCC) – I have now reached the grand total of 40 books, the total number I read in 2007. In honour of this, here are some brief insights into my more recent reading. They’re all exactly 150 words long, because I am a gigantic geek. (And I’m okay about it.)

Quarantine
Jim Crace

Quarantine by Jim Crace
Josh indirectly introduced me to Jim Crace through the combination of our libraries. It centres around a group of people undertaking the 40 days ‘quarantine’. The writing is spare without being devoid of some wonderful storytelling, linguistic beauty or feeling for his unlucky desert characters. The bleakness of Crace’s fiction emphasises and reaffirms the story, the landscape and the harsh experiences of the group. It also contains perhaps the most villainous character so far in my reading this year. Wouldn’t want to meet him on a dark and stormy night.
In a lesser novelist’s hands, this could have been a bad book. Crace has a gift for language, but importantly also exhibits in Quarantine a light touch and irrepressible humanity. Characters can be foolish, ridiculous even, but there’s a narrative empathy ongoing through the text which prevents it steering into territory which is hard for a reader to connect to.
The Argumentative Indian by Amartya Sen

The economist Amartya Sen is one of my favourite contemporary intellectuals. Here, he plunges his very intelligent teeth (were there ever such clever molars?) into a set of essays on India. It’s taken from his writing and speeches, and the collection as a whole is fascinating, if at times repetitive; the worst criticism of the book I can make, but understandable given its structure.
Sen provides some clear insights into an undeniably rich culture. He touches – among other things – on imperialism*, religion, literature and politics. He has always been a thoughtful, reasoned chap, and never stoops to bland rhetoric. Sen’s forceful views and clarity of expression expose not just the injustice of a narrow reading of India’s past (and present and future) but also discuss the difficulties he has with extremist political parties within India. It’s shamelessly academic in tone, but also rich in cultural awareness and humanity.
Company of Liars
Karen Maitland

The Company of Liars by Karen Maitland
I picked this up because I find the time of the plague fascinating. It’s a disturbing part of our history, not just because there was lots of really quite unpleasant disease but also, to my mind, because of the terror. The lack of medical knowledge, the poor communication and transport links, all must have contributed to fear on a scale I can barely imagine.
So, yes, a great novel about the Black Death? Get me in on some of that action! This, however, isn’t going to be it. It’s a clumsy, heavy-handed and shallow interpretation of the period claiming to be a subtle mystery. The characters lack any kind of depth, the writing is child-like (I’d be excited if my 6-year old niece wrote this, but I still wouldn’t pick it up from a bookshop), and there’s never any real engagement with the fascinating psychology of the period. Very disappointing.
Wolf Hall
Wolf Hall

Hilary Mantel

Wolf Hall by Hilary Mantel
People will either love this or hate it with a fiery and vengeful passion. I, however, did enjoy it, but am mindful of its flaws. The sentence structure (brief as brief can be) can be over-worked and therefore occasionally quite irritating. While I like authors to be thoughtful, I don’t generally like their overt thought processes on what makes exciting writing to be flashing themselves in my face, begging and screaming for attention. Overall, it could have benefited from a great deal more subtlety.
Yet as a book of Tudor political intrigue it is ‘A Ripping Yarn’. Despite some poor characterisation, especially of ‘second generation characters’, there are some lovely passages. The portrayals of King Henry VIII, Anne Boleyn and Cardinal Wolsey are all super. There’s also a carefully nuanced sense of historical immediacy and tension throughout. Worth a read if you don’t get too upset by the linguistic boo-boos.

If you’re going to read one of these it should really be: Quarantine
Best book for bludgeoning people out of the way on the tube: Wolf Hall (it’s still in hardback)

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

In praise of small bookshops

Posted by Jenny | Posted in Uncategorized | Posted on 16-11-2009

0

Near where I live now, there's a small bookshop, called 'Prospero's Books'. It's been a long time, really, since I had access to that kind of small, local bookshop, rather than your usual Waterstones and Borders. And oh but I truly do hate Borders with a passion that borders – ha! – upon the unreasonable.

So I'd forgotten how pleasant it could be to amble round a smallish shop so chock-full of books that you can barely move. It's comfortingly like my living room (and bedroom back in Somerset). There are genuine reasons, though, why sometimes Small Is Best; at least where the bookshop in question is a good one.

In large bookshops, while there can be much glee, and I can spend many a happy hour in there, sometimes it's actually overwhelming, and not always for the good reasons, e.g. overwhelmingly awesome. Large bookshops are, naturally, catering to a market that is wider than just me. I am, and I know this, a book snob. Most people are not. These bookshops are partly for me, and they do have sections which cater to my interests, but I have to wade through an awful lot of things that I'm not interested in first. So a lot of the time I spend in these larger shops is spent trawling for the gems.

Here lies the beauty of a small bookshop, where the stock is chosen with exquisite care, knowledge, and taste. Often when I go to a bookshop, I'm not necessarily looking for something specific, I just like being among the books, seeing what looks interesting, or looking broadly for something I might care to read and not really minding whether it be philosophy, history, classical literature or contemporary fiction. When I go into Prospero's, that search is entirely satisfying. It's a bookshop built by book lovers, and while the sections are small – a bookcase of philosophy, for example – what has gone into them has been chosen well. A lot of the chaff has already been weeded out; I'm interested in a lot more of what they do have.

Naturally, they need to cater for popular fiction and chart stuff which isn't always – or perhaps even often (book snob, remember?) – up my street, and that's fine. The real quality is there in spades.

I went in there a couple of days ago, had a bit of a browse, and the first book I put my hand on was by Amin Maalouf. A writer I actually had not heard of, but the book looked incredibly interesting, as did the writer. So I got two of his books, which really appealed to me. The same thing happened the last time I was in the shop (when I got a copy of Early Greek Philosophy and Herta Muller's Land of Green Plums).

I expect those books are in the larger bookshops, too.* I'd be a lot less likely to find them, though. 

Of course there's a place for both, and sometimes I want to be in a wholeroom full of political theory, rather than a shelf of well-chosen examples of it, but it's nice to be reminded of how different the experiences are, and how valuable a little time spent in a small, good, bookshop can be.

Books are awesome.


[* Although they had some philosophy books there that I had gone into a large Waterstones specifically looking for, only for them not to be found. As I said: these guys have taste. Shame on you, Waterstones!]

Read and post comments | Send to a friend