Frustration and a Chunkster

Posted by Jenny | Posted in Reading Challenges | Posted on 27-02-2010

0

All has been quiet on the blog lately, due to excessive levels of busy-ness. I have been reading, however, and what’s more I even tried to blog a couple of days ago, only to be met by Epic Computer Fail (ECF) in the middle of it, and losing everything I’d written. Highly irritating! By that point, I was sleepy and went to bed rather than re-typing. Hence the frustration.

This time, I’m going to keep it short and sweet.
Since I last checked in, I’ve been on a bit of a Diana Wynne Jones kick, as part of my mission to catch up on all things Wynne Jones. So I have had some rather satisfying reading, with Castle in the Air last time, and I’ve now caught up with The Lives of Christopher Chant:
Excellent fun it was, too!
I loved them both, although did have a slight preference for Christopher Chant (the second book of the Chrestomanci series), which was superb. One of the striking things about it, for a children’s book, is that it doesn’t pull all the punches. It’s certainly no Tess of the D’Urbevilles* but it did involve some moments which didn’t hold back from highlighting the potential consequences of intentionally looking the other way. A very satisfying book for my poor, tired brain.
Castle in the Air was also great as I mentioned before, but I think perhaps that (this being the sequel to Howl’s Moving Castle) Howl, Sophie and Calcifer are hard protagonists to follow. The characters in this were entertaining, but didn’t quite grab me in the same way.
It’s not just been children’s fiction, though! Now that it is February and the start of the Chunkster Challenge, I saw fit to read the first chunkster of the year, and one that I’d been looking forward to immensely: Orhan Pamuk’s Museum of Innocence:

It’s a hard one to write about, I find. It’s a very good book, but equally disturbing. The main character from whose perspective the book is written, is the collector of the objects in his Museum of Innocence, Kemal. What I found disturbing was the long drawn-out transformation (although not a substantial change in character) from his position as a wealthy young Istanbul businessman with position and contacts to his end position as a man who obsessively collects and reminisces over his peculiar relationship with a young shopgirl, Fusun.
Why I say that he doesn’t, for me, change greatly in terms of his disposition and character is that throughout he seems to be fundamentally careless of other people, and their actual needs, wants, and desires. All revolves around himself, and his own projections. He frequently discusses how he is thought of by other characters, but this seems to be rooted in his own views about those others and himself, as much as the social context in which he lives. This makes some parts of the end of the book interesting, as it casts light on how he was actually perceived.
He continues to collect items (such as huge numbers of cigarette stubs) throughout the end of his affair with Fusun, and the years he spends coming nightly to her family home for dinner – after her own marriage – to watch and be near her.
But it’s not a romance, and it’s not romantic, and nor do I think it was ever intended to be. Fusun is the ‘object of his affection’, and the trite phrase is particularly apt: Fusun, to him, never really takes on a full identity. She is there, always, but not as a fully developed person in his mind. His wish to marry her felt for me as if it were part of his compulsion to collect anything to do with her. He shows no interest in furthering her own wishes and dreams, preferring to keep her as she is in his mind, within the house where he can observe her movements and possessions.
So it’s fascinating, but a novel where the central character is a morally ambiguous one, at times hard to put your finger on, and at other times faintly contemptible. In the background of the primary plot, Pamuk brings in discussions of modernisation, conflict, class, sex and the power of objects at work on the imagination.
I’m not doing very well this morning at articulating my thoughts on what is an entertaining, but quite complex, book. Let’s just leave it at this: it’s good!
* Tess of the D’Urbevilles made me ridiculously sad. Way to pull at the heart strings, Thomas Hardy!

And now a word from the resident gnome…
Finally getting to grips with the big stuff, eh? Well well. Seems like a good choice. Lots of other big books with long words out there, though, so don’t you stop now.

And speaking of Diana Wynne Jones books, I was reminded this week about Alan Garner, and his brilliant fiction. Why not have another bash through those books, eh?

Anybody else other than a humble gnome remember Alan Garner, and his Weirdstone of Brisingamen, or the Owl Service?

Anyway, that’s one book notched up for the Chunkster Challenge, at 532 pages. Now for the next!

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

'The Whole Wide Beauty' by Emily Woof

Posted by Fliss | Posted in Uncategorized | Posted on 24-02-2010

0

I really wanted to like this book, another LibraryThing early reviewers book, and there were certainly elements of the book that I enjoyed, but, for me,the whole wide beauty was slightly disappointing. Despite this, I certainly wouldn't rule out reading another book by Emily Woof, as most of the problems I had with the novel were with the characters, rather than the plot or the writing.

Woof's writing is clear, concise, and highly descriptive, and in some passages of the book she shows that she possesses a highly inventive turn of phrase, and a beautiful lyrical style. There are some parts of the book that are also very moving, especially the ending.

The plot, too, is interesting and multi-layered, with the story of Katherine, a retired dancer having an affair with her father's protegee, running parallel with the story of her father's attempts to save the poetry foundation he has spent his life trying to build up. There are also several more sub-plots interweaving with the main story, all with varying degrees of interest.

What really let the book down for me, then, were the character's themselves. It wasn't exactly that there was a lack of characterisation within the whole wide beauty, or that the characters were unbelievable, but more that the characters themselves were highly unlikeable, at least to me. I found the level of self-absorption of the characters highly irritating, and at points almost sickening; at one point Katherine, who works in a school for mentally disturbed children, watches a boy repeatedly bang his head against a piano, to the point of making himself bloody, and yet all she can really think about is her own reaction to the incident, and whether she can cope with it, and there are several similar, though less violent, incidents throughout the book.However, this was a very personal reaction to the characters, and other people might not see the same thing in the characters that I did.

Overall, I am glad that I had the opportunity to read the book, which is probably not a book I would have picked up in a bookshop on my own, and the whole wide beauty is certainly a promising and highly accomplished debut novel. I would certainly be interested to read another book by Woof, and can't help wishing that I had been able to empathise with the characters to a greater degree.

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

In Deep: Ingo by Helen Dunmore.

Posted by Fliss | Posted in Uncategorized | Posted on 15-02-2010

0

Ingo
Helen Dunmore

Ingo is the first book in a tetralogy for teenage readers, and, to my shame, the first book by Helen Dunmore that I have ever read, although I have several of her novels for adults in my library. However, I can easily imagine the traits that make Ingo such an exceptional book carrying over into her adult fiction.

The story is narrated in the first person by Sapphire, an adolescent girl living in Cornwall, whose father disappears from his boat one night and is presumed dead by everybody except Sapphire and her brother Connor. It is only when Connor disappears briefly as well that the key to their father's mysterious disappearance is revealed to the siblings as they discover they have Mer blood, and the ability to survive in the underwater domain of Ingo.

There is a strange, eerie quality to much of the writing in Ingo that lingers in the mind long after you have finished reading, but the book is undoubtedly beautifully written, with wonderful pacing, and Dunmore is clearly incredibly gifted when it comes to description, both of the local Cornish landscape and the underwater world of Ingo. Furthermore, she has created unique, sensitive and highly likeable characters in Sapphire and Connor.

Helen Dunmore also has an amazing gift for mixing the bigger issues into her narrative, and passages describing over-fishing, oil-spills, and other ecologically disastrous events are all mixed into Sapphires discovery of Ingo. I am so glad this book is part of a series, though, as I really didn't want the book to end, and I will definitely be reading the rest of these books at the first possible opportunity.

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

Becoming privy to literary enjoyment

Posted by Jenny | Posted in Uncategorized | Posted on 09-02-2010

0

I was thinking today about the odd places in which people read. 
I haven't really got any terribly exciting stories about daredevil reading adventures. Never have I whipped through an edition of Anna Karenina whilst bungee-jumping from the Golden Gate Bridge. I confess to having never sampled the literary delights of reading at the bottom of the ocean (remember the laminate the pages first).
But there is one place where I do tend to read, and it is the humble toilet. Not just my toilet, any toilet will do. If we're really being honest with ourselves, sitting on the loo is fairly boring. Just think of how much time we spend idling away on our favourite commode, and it probably adds up to quite a lot over the course of a lifetime.
So who can blame me for seeking to enrich this experience with a little light reading?
Toilets in which I have been known to pick up a book: 
1. The toilets in my family's houses. Not all of them, but quite a significant number.
2. My own toilet, of course. Here I feel able to fully indulge, and have been known to stay until I get pins and needles (although that doesn't take long).
3. The toilet at work. This is a bit of a sneaky one, but I've only done this just to finish off the paragraph that I had to finish in the middle of when I came to the end of my commute. I'm not a bad person, really I'm not!
4. Just occasionally, my friend's toilets get the book treatment. Especially if they've been foolish enough to leave me in their houses on my own.
5. Toilets at museums and art galleries. This works particularly well at Tate Britain, I find. No judgement, just sayin'.
6. Pub toilets. Not always immensely salubrious, but sometimes a little respite is needed from loud music and having to shout to make myself heard. I like going to pubs! I like it better when I can spend a couple of minutes whipping out my comfort-book in the privacy of the ladies'.
So there you go. Now over to you; where are your reading spots?
(Hee hee, a toilet that's an aquarium.)

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

Read it and weep (and Sunday happies)

Posted by Jenny | Posted in Uncategorized | Posted on 07-02-2010

0

First up, on this lovely relaxing Sunday morning let's start with the Sunday happies! I've been looking forward to Not the TV Book Group since Kirsty at Other Stories blogged about it a little while ago. It's a fun project, and I find that on this, The Guardian and I are of the same mind.

So for those of you who are interested, the first 'programme' is now up on dovegreyreader's blog. I fully intend to be more spectator than following along with the books, but I'm enjoying the start of this immensely as it is. Dovegreyreader used the magic words – 'clotted cream' – to get me in and keep me hooked. 
In other Jen-book news, you might remember that I was very excited to hear that there was to be a new translation of The Second Sex. I was hoping for at least an improvement but sadly, it seems as though that may not be the case. The translators seem to have mangled the book in ways that even I, with my limited French, know quite well is misleading, unintentionally hilarious, or just plain wrong:


The book is marred by unidiomatic or unintelligible phrases and clueless syntax; by expressions such as ‘the forger being’, ‘man’s work equal’, ‘the adulteress wife’, and ‘leisure in château life’; and formulations such as ‘because since woman is certainly to a large extent man’s invention’, ‘a condition unique to France is that of the unmarried woman’, ‘alone she does not succeed in separating herself in reality’, ‘this uncoupling can occur in a maternal form.’ The translation is blighted by the constant use of ‘false friends’, words that sound the same but don’t mean the same in the two languages

Seemingly, that isn't even as bad as it gets. Alas, I think I'd find reading the new translation just too much of a chore. I like my feminist philosophy like I like my food menus: legible. Mmmm. Cake.

And so we don't end this on a sad note, how awesome is the Lost Man Booker Prize? I think there's something quite interesting about having a book prize for books published in years gone by; perhaps the lapse of time and the additional perspective gained will mean that the books chosen today are not exactly those that would have been picked back in 1970. An interesting point to ponder.


Read and post comments | Send to a friend

Mysteriously Beautiful: The 'Griffin and Sabine' trilogy.

Posted by Fliss | Posted in Uncategorized | Posted on 07-02-2010

2

I only received the Griffin and Sabine box set this week, for my birthday, although I have been hankering after this trilogy for a long, long time.

Nick Bantock, the author, is a fully trained artist, and it clearly comes across in the books, which are half graphic novel, and half epistolary novel. The letters in the novel are written between two artists, Griffin Moss and Sabine Strohem, who have never met, and are separated by thousands of miles.

The story begins when Griffin receives his first letter from Sabine, who claims to be able to see what he is painting while he works by some form of remote viewing, and moves on from there to become a beautiful, enganging, and highly original love story.

Sabine's Notebook
Nick Bantock

Each of the letters can be taken out of their envelopes, and read as if they were a genuine letter that had been accidently stumbled across, creating a wonderfully intimate atmosphere for the books, and meaning that the novels were a tactile, as well as a literary, pleasure to read.

However, it is not just the novel concept behind the books that make them such a joy to read; the artwork is genuinely superb, and, somehow, Bantock has managed to create two individual, and yet complementary, styles for his protagonists, both in their artwork and their writing styles, that makes the idea of their being somehow, inexplicably, connected entirely believable in this strange and compelling literary universe. I don't want to say any more about the story, in case I spoiler.

Nevertheless, the story genuinely made the hairs stand up on the back of my neck in some places, and, while I didn't want the story to end, I couldn't put the books down, and just had to keep on reading and reading until I was finished.

I was really worried that the books wouldn't live up to my expectations, once I had finally gotten my hands on them, but, if anything, the Griffin and Sabine trilogy exceeded my high expectations by a mile. 

Yes, the concept is original, and this was a large part of the initial appeal of the books for me, but the plot could easily have been let down by a writer or artist less accomplished than Nick Bantock. Thankfully, Bantock has enough skill in both fields to make the book not just quirky, but incredibly beautiful, moving, and disturbing in equal measure, and I am incredibly glad that I got the chance to read them.

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

A catch-up on the week's reading

Posted by Jenny | Posted in Uncategorized | Posted on 06-02-2010

1

I not infrequently get quite invested in books, and Miss Smilla's Feeling for Snow was one of those that had me:
a) avidly turning the next page, desperate for the heroine to succeed;
b) hiding the book away and looking pitiful at the thought that there were characters who might turn out to be not wholly sympathetic;
c) and glaring at the page, as though this could adequately transmit my disapproval of the book's antagonists.
So, naturally, I had fun! It's a great book, with fascinating central characters, Smilla Jaspersen especially. On the face of it, it's a thriller, a mystery novel; but for me, the success of the book is that it doesn't stop there. I've read my share of detective books, and have tended to complain of a lot of them that the central mystery takes pride of place to the exclusion of anything else – characterisation, setting, political and cultural background – all of which can make for a more interesting, deeper novel with a lot more power. Consequently, I tend to get more invested in the central plotline if the book is good in other ways.
Which puts Miss Smilla's Feeling for Snow ahead of the curve, in my opinion. It discusses Denmark's colonial past and the difficulties of Greenlanders in adapting to Danish society and culture; the demands of 'civilised society'; and also includes the wonderful Smilla, a scientist specialising in snow and ice. The ice is both threatening and comforting; it's powerful but gives Smilla an edge over everybody else. The passages where she talks about ice never appear distracting, and are often quite welcome passages of calm.
I'm reading it more than a decade later than everybody else, but think I can be forgiven, as I was only seven when it first came out. Also, I don't know about anybody else, but when everybody's raving about a book and goes on about how much I'd like it, I just feel too much pressure. I want to read the book on my own terms, and need a bit of distance from the surrounding noise and hoo-hah about it. So, 18 years after it was initially published, I felt able to read this book. So alright world, you win, for it is good.
Now my book choices tend to be dictated by how I feel at the particular moment in which I pick them up. I finished this book on Wednesday.
On Wednesday morning, I happened to fall down the stairs. Miraculously avoiding head, back and all other important things and breaking no bones whatsoever, it nevertheless hurts when one's posterior bears the brunt of a full flight of wooden stairs. Quite a lot, actually! 
So when I got home from work (I'm a trooper, me), I felt bruised and woeful and was pretty happy that my latest book order had arrived, containing Diana Wynne Jones first sequel to Howl's Moving Castle, Castle in the Air
With the small caveat that there were some things that grated with me (the 'comedy' of the protagonist's horror at being faced with a pair of 'fat brides', being one of them), it follows the great Diana Wynne Jones tradition of being furiously awesome.
What's more, while reading children's books as an adult can often mean that you see all the plot twists coming from a mile off, I genuinely did not see one of the key twists in the conclusion of this one. Well played, Ms Jones, well played.
I haven't yet got the second sequel, House of Many Ways, but oh I will! I hadn't realised just how many of her books I hadn't read until I discussed them with a friend who (I believe) has bought every book Diana Wynne Jones has ever written. Aghast at the treachery of my adult self towards my inner child, I resolved to make haste to catch up. So you'll probably be seeing a few more of these on my blog this year!
Alphonse is pretty upset this week, as neither of these books contribute to a challenge at all. Whoops! But next up is Orhan Pamuk's Museum of Innocence, which at a fairly significant 532 pages will certainly contribute to the chunkster challenge. I've been wanting to read this since I heard about it, so this makes me very happy. It's going to be a good weekend, folks!

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

Children's Fiction: 'Swallows and Amazons' and 'Tom's Midnight Garden'.

Posted by Fliss | Posted in Uncategorized | Posted on 06-02-2010

2

Swallows and Amazons
Arthur Ransome

The wonderful thing about studying children's literature as part of a literature degree is that it gives you a perfect excuse to read children's fiction without anyone thinking you're weird. You can revisit the favourite books of your childhood, but you are also introduced to authors you have never read before, which is the case with Arthur Ransome.

So, onto the review; Swallows and Amazons rocks. Yes, I am aware that's not really a good description of the book, but it does. The children in the book have the kind of childhood that I can't help wishing I had had, one spent sailing and adventuring in a perfect summer setting, living on an island in the middle of a lake, free from parental influence for the most part.

It's a lovely, gentle book, and Ransome really seems to have a great affinity for his readers. I wish I'd read the book fifteen years ago, it would have been the kind of book my nine-year-old self would have read over and over again, but better late than never, as they say. Now I just have to come up with an excuse to read the other eleven books in the series.

 

Tom's Midnight Garden
Philippa Pearce

Philippa Pearce's time-slip fantasy, Tom's Midnight Garden, was the second children's book I read this month and, while I did really enjoy it, I didn't love it as much as Swallows and Amazons; it just isn't as whimsical as Ransome's book, and I am a big fan of the whimsy.

Still, the characters are well formed, and the story is very original, and beautifully written, with a twist at the end of the book that was delightful. It's a less action-packed novel than Ransome's, and more psychologically based, but it has its own charm. It just didn't appeal to the child in me as much as Swallows and Amazons, although I'm glad to have read both books, and they are certainly staying in my permanant library after my course has finished.

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

'Orlando' by Virginia Woolf

Posted by Fliss | Posted in Uncategorized | Posted on 04-02-2010

4

Orlando was the last book I read this January. More than one person had told me that I would enjoy the book, which I had to read for a course in twentieth century literature, and they were right. The book itself is concerned with the eponymous Orlando and his/her travels, from Tudor England to Constantinople, where, for no clear reason, Orlando's gender switches from male to female, and then back to England, where she is still living at the book's time of writing, 1928, as a highly successful female writer.

There was a wonderful synthesis of realism and fantasy in the book which was genuinely enjoyable, and the lighthearted, straightforward style of the work, including the voice of the squeamish, supercilious faux-biographer who narrates the novel, is a far cry from Woolf's other, perhaps more difficult, novels, although all have their wonderful qualities.

Having also read Portrait of a Marriage, about Vita Sackville-West and her husband, last month, I could easily see the parallels between the life of Orlando and that of Vita Sackville-West, on whom the character of Orlando was based, but I still can't work out whether this made the book more or less enjoyable for me. Overall, though, I thought the book was beautifully written, and I'm glad that I took the opportuntity to read it.

Read and post comments | Send to a friend