All has been quiet on the blog lately, due to excessive levels of busy-ness. I have been reading, however, and what’s more I even tried to blog a couple of days ago, only to be met by Epic Computer Fail (ECF) in the middle of it, and losing everything I’d written. Highly irritating! By that point, I was sleepy and went to bed rather than re-typing. Hence the frustration.
This time, I’m going to keep it short and sweet.
Since I last checked in, I’ve been on a bit of a Diana Wynne Jones kick, as part of my mission to catch up on all things Wynne Jones. So I have had some rather satisfying reading, with Castle in the Air last time, and I’ve now caught up with The Lives of Christopher Chant:
Excellent fun it was, too!
I loved them both, although did have a slight preference for Christopher Chant (the second book of the Chrestomanci series), which was superb. One of the striking things about it, for a children’s book, is that it doesn’t pull all the punches. It’s certainly no Tess of the D’Urbevilles* but it did involve some moments which didn’t hold back from highlighting the potential consequences of intentionally looking the other way. A very satisfying book for my poor, tired brain.
Castle in the Air was also great as I mentioned before, but I think perhaps that (this being the sequel to Howl’s Moving Castle) Howl, Sophie and Calcifer are hard protagonists to follow. The characters in this were entertaining, but didn’t quite grab me in the same way.
It’s not just been children’s fiction, though! Now that it is February and the start of the Chunkster Challenge, I saw fit to read the first chunkster of the year, and one that I’d been looking forward to immensely: Orhan Pamuk’s Museum of Innocence:
It’s a hard one to write about, I find. It’s a very good book, but equally disturbing. The main character from whose perspective the book is written, is the collector of the objects in his Museum of Innocence, Kemal. What I found disturbing was the long drawn-out transformation (although not a substantial change in character) from his position as a wealthy young Istanbul businessman with position and contacts to his end position as a man who obsessively collects and reminisces over his peculiar relationship with a young shopgirl, Fusun.
Why I say that he doesn’t, for me, change greatly in terms of his disposition and character is that throughout he seems to be fundamentally careless of other people, and their actual needs, wants, and desires. All revolves around himself, and his own projections. He frequently discusses how he is thought of by other characters, but this seems to be rooted in his own views about those others and himself, as much as the social context in which he lives. This makes some parts of the end of the book interesting, as it casts light on how he was actually perceived.
He continues to collect items (such as huge numbers of cigarette stubs) throughout the end of his affair with Fusun, and the years he spends coming nightly to her family home for dinner – after her own marriage – to watch and be near her.
But it’s not a romance, and it’s not romantic, and nor do I think it was ever intended to be. Fusun is the ‘object of his affection’, and the trite phrase is particularly apt: Fusun, to him, never really takes on a full identity. She is there, always, but not as a fully developed person in his mind. His wish to marry her felt for me as if it were part of his compulsion to collect anything to do with her. He shows no interest in furthering her own wishes and dreams, preferring to keep her as she is in his mind, within the house where he can observe her movements and possessions.
So it’s fascinating, but a novel where the central character is a morally ambiguous one, at times hard to put your finger on, and at other times faintly contemptible. In the background of the primary plot, Pamuk brings in discussions of modernisation, conflict, class, sex and the power of objects at work on the imagination.
I’m not doing very well this morning at articulating my thoughts on what is an entertaining, but quite complex, book. Let’s just leave it at this: it’s good!
*
Tess of the D’Urbevilles made me ridiculously sad. Way to pull at the heart strings, Thomas Hardy!
And now a word from the resident gnome…
Finally getting to grips with the big stuff, eh? Well well. Seems like a good choice. Lots of other big books with long words out there, though, so don’t you stop now.
And speaking of Diana Wynne Jones books, I was reminded this week about Alan Garner, and his brilliant fiction. Why not have another bash through those books, eh?
Anybody else other than a humble gnome remember Alan Garner, and his Weirdstone of Brisingamen, or the Owl Service?
Anyway, that’s one book notched up for the Chunkster Challenge, at 532 pages. Now for the next!
Read and post comments | Send to a friend